The technology lands in weeks. The organisation takes longer, and that is the project

Transformation programmes rarely fail on the build. They fail because the organisation had four other programmes running, the same six people were on all of them, and nobody owned the part where people work differently. This service is the work between a plan and a changed company.

  • A sequence the organisation can absorb. Two changes done properly rather than five started, ordered against real capacity rather than an ideal roadmap.
  • A named owner per change. Someone accountable for the outcome, not for the deliverable, with the authority to decide.
  • A working operating model. Who does what after the system exists, including the roles that change and the ones that disappear.
  • Measured adoption. Whether people actually use it, tracked from the start, because a system nobody uses is indistinguishable from a system that was never built.
Talk to us about this

What is delivered

  • Capacity assessment

    Every programme currently running, who is on more than one, and how much change the organisation can genuinely take this quarter. Usually a shock to the people who commissioned them.

  • Sequenced portfolio

    What is done first, what is deliberately deferred, and what is stopped. Stopping something is normally the highest-value decision in the document.

  • Target operating model, in practice

    Not a diagram: role by role, what changes, what the new handoffs are, and what the first uncomfortable month looks like.

  • Adoption plan with owners

    Training, pairing, incentives and the specific people who will resist and why. Budgeted as work rather than added as a workstream nobody staffs.

  • Measurement

    The two or three numbers that will show whether this worked, baselined before anything changes so the comparison is possible later.

  • Governance that fits

    Decision rights and escalation sized to the organisation. A twenty-person company does not need a steering committee, and a two-thousand-person one cannot proceed without one.

How it runs

  1. 01

    Baseline

    What is running, what it costs and who is stretched. Measured rather than asked, because the answer to how busy are you is always the same.

  2. 02

    Sequence

    Agree the order and, more importantly, what stops. This is the meeting that determines the outcome of the programme.

  3. 03

    Land the first one

    One change, all the way through to people working differently. The credibility earned here funds everything after it.

  4. 04

    Transfer

    Your people run the next ones. Our involvement declines on a written schedule, and if it does not, that is a finding.

A good fit when

  • You have a strategy or a plan and nothing has changed six months later.
  • Previous programmes delivered technology that nobody adopted.
  • Several initiatives are competing for the same small group of people.
  • The operating model has not been revisited since before the AI work started.

Not the right service when

  • You are about to merge, restructure or enter a new market — wait, because this work gets undone.
  • Nobody internal has the authority and attention to carry it. Without that it stalls halfway, which is worse than not starting.
  • What you actually want is engineering capacity. Buy that instead; it is cheaper and more honest.

Frequently asked questions

How is this different from the strategy service?
Strategy decides what is worth doing. Transformation is the work of getting it done inside an organisation that has other priorities. Companies frequently buy the first, discover the second was the hard part, and treat that as a surprise.
Do you do the engineering as well?
Usually yes, and the reason is that separating the two is how programmes fail. A recommendation nobody builds and a build nobody adopted are the two standard outcomes and they have the same root cause.
How long is a realistic engagement?
The first change lands in weeks. The organisational part runs in months and should get smaller as it goes. If our involvement is the same size in month nine as in month two, something has gone wrong and we would rather say so.
What if people resist?
They will, and usually for good reasons that are worth hearing. The adoption plan names who loses something and what is done about it. Programmes that treat resistance as an attitude problem lose to programmes that treat it as information.
Can you work alongside an existing consultancy?
Yes. It is common and it works when the boundary is written down. What does not work is two suppliers with overlapping scopes and no agreement on who decides.