The technology lands in weeks. The organisation takes longer, and that is the project
Transformation programmes rarely fail on the build. They fail because the organisation had four other programmes running, the same six people were on all of them, and nobody owned the part where people work differently. This service is the work between a plan and a changed company.
- A sequence the organisation can absorb. Two changes done properly rather than five started, ordered against real capacity rather than an ideal roadmap.
- A named owner per change. Someone accountable for the outcome, not for the deliverable, with the authority to decide.
- A working operating model. Who does what after the system exists, including the roles that change and the ones that disappear.
- Measured adoption. Whether people actually use it, tracked from the start, because a system nobody uses is indistinguishable from a system that was never built.
What is delivered
Capacity assessment
Every programme currently running, who is on more than one, and how much change the organisation can genuinely take this quarter. Usually a shock to the people who commissioned them.
Sequenced portfolio
What is done first, what is deliberately deferred, and what is stopped. Stopping something is normally the highest-value decision in the document.
Target operating model, in practice
Not a diagram: role by role, what changes, what the new handoffs are, and what the first uncomfortable month looks like.
Adoption plan with owners
Training, pairing, incentives and the specific people who will resist and why. Budgeted as work rather than added as a workstream nobody staffs.
Measurement
The two or three numbers that will show whether this worked, baselined before anything changes so the comparison is possible later.
Governance that fits
Decision rights and escalation sized to the organisation. A twenty-person company does not need a steering committee, and a two-thousand-person one cannot proceed without one.
How it runs
- 01
Baseline
What is running, what it costs and who is stretched. Measured rather than asked, because the answer to how busy are you is always the same.
- 02
Sequence
Agree the order and, more importantly, what stops. This is the meeting that determines the outcome of the programme.
- 03
Land the first one
One change, all the way through to people working differently. The credibility earned here funds everything after it.
- 04
Transfer
Your people run the next ones. Our involvement declines on a written schedule, and if it does not, that is a finding.
A good fit when
- You have a strategy or a plan and nothing has changed six months later.
- Previous programmes delivered technology that nobody adopted.
- Several initiatives are competing for the same small group of people.
- The operating model has not been revisited since before the AI work started.
Not the right service when
- You are about to merge, restructure or enter a new market — wait, because this work gets undone.
- Nobody internal has the authority and attention to carry it. Without that it stalls halfway, which is worse than not starting.
- What you actually want is engineering capacity. Buy that instead; it is cheaper and more honest.
Frequently asked questions
How is this different from the strategy service?
Do you do the engineering as well?
How long is a realistic engagement?
What if people resist?
Can you work alongside an existing consultancy?
Other services
AI Strategy
Which decisions are worth changing, what each would cost, and what would measurably be different. Including the ones where the answer is not AI.
Read articleAI Agents Engineering
Agents that do work rather than answer questions — with bounds, tools, approval gates and a decision log that survives the first incident.
Read articleAI-Native Apps Design
Designing software around a component that is fast, useful and sometimes wrong — which is a different design problem from anything before it.
Read article
